This issue marks the second anniversary of the Progressive Populist
as a publication. It is said that less than 10 percent of periodicals survive
two years and we are proud to have made the cut. We undoubtedly have surprised
a few skeptics as we have published every month and slowly built our circulation
to a little more than 2,000.
Fight the Freebooters,
Get the Word Out
We appreciate all our subscribers. We particularly thank those charter subscribers
who not only took a chance on our new Journal from the Heartland but now
have chosen to renew for another year or two. For those who have held off
on subscribing, wondering if we would last, let the word go forth: We're
here to stay.
Not everybody has been happy with our work. Occasionally we get a note from
somebody who thinks we are too liberal, or even socialist. About as often
we get a note from somebody who thinks we are not radical enough. But the
great majority of our correspondence is appreciative of our efforts to revive
democratic political debate, and that is gratifying.
Some enquiring minds wonder why we started a journal of politics and economics.
Lord knows, starting a political magazine that starts off by alienating
corporations is a good way to lose a bundle and we're not wealthy. But we
grew up believing that in America individuals can make a difference, and
if you believe in something you should go for it.
We also grew up in a relatively small Iowa town that reflects the changes
going on in rural America. Storm Lake in the 1960s, when I was growing up
there, was probably as close to an egalitarian community as you're likely
to find. We knew the grocer, the butcher, the banker, the hardware store
owner, the newspaper publisher, the radio station manager and the local
meatpacking plant executive. Anybody who tried to put on airs likely would
be ridiculed for their pretension. Some of the wealthiest people in the
county, at least on paper, were farmers and you wouldn't want to put on
their airs, particularly if they raised hogs. But in the businesses along
the main street, Lake Avenue, everybody pitched in for the community. If
a business manager laid somebody off, he or she would have to look that
person and their families in the eye when they passed on the street.
The town still looks the same, but chains have turned the groceries into
supermarkets; they took over the newspaper and radio station; they're moving
in on the local banks; they've placed the discount stories on the outskirts
of town and driven the dime stores and hardware stores out of business.
You still know who works at the chain stores but you don't have a clue who
owns them or who issues the order to "downsize." The phone company
is diversifying its services in more lucrative markets and cutting its local
staff. The meatpacking plant changed hands, drove out the union and cut
wages to the point where they had to bring in workers from out of state.
They include immigrants from Mexico, Asia and Africa who make more in an
hour there than they made in a day or even a week back home. Storm Lake
has a lot more colorful festivals than we used to have, but it also has
the state's largest share of students taking English as a second language
-- and growing ethnic hostility.
Now the factory farms are moving in, threatening to replace the family-owned
farms, feed stores and stockyards that have served small towns in the Midwest
for generations. Change is inevitable; it's progress, we are told. But in
the new integrated agribusiness, farmers will grow crops from seeds sold
by the gene-altering bioengineers and they'll raise livestock to specifications
set by the meatpacking corporation. If the farmers balk, the bank will call
in their loans and sell the farm to somebody who will be more cooperative.
Everybody will work for Wall Street. The Company Store will be Walmart.
Vertically integrated sharecroppers will end up owing their souls to MasterCard.
This is progress? More importantly, how did we come to this in the span
of one generation?
In the case of the farmer, first we ran him into debt in the 1970s. We made
him dependent on credit and chemicals in the 1980s. Then we exposed him
to global competition in the 1990s and replaced the local bankers with executives
from Minneapolis, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles.
The New Deal, coming out of the Great Depression, helped small farmers climb
out of their sharecropping condition and put some stability into agriculture.
It has taken 50 years for big business to put farmers back "in their
As the independent farmer goes, so goes the small towns. There's still nothing
wrong with Storm Lake that $5-a-bushel corn and $60 a cwt hogs couldn't
cure. But when Wall Street owns the crop from seed to cereal and the hogs
from birth to bacon, Storm Lake won't see those premium prices. It will
only see the minimum-wage jobs of the farmhands, meatpackers and the fly-by-night
industries looking for cheap labor and tax breaks. It is time to stand up
and demand social responsibility in corporations toward workers, small businesses
and family farmers.
SOME THINK WE are too hard on President Clinton. We get no satisfaction
out of blasting the President, but we have seen little to cheer him on lately.
He rode a populist campaign into the White House, only to end up looking
like an Eisenhower Republican and a cheerleader for a brand of capitalism
that has more to do with freebooters than free markets. He has embraced
the global trade policies advocated by multinational corporations and offered
little more than lip service to the workers and small businesses who have
the most to lose from globalized trade. He has accepted the Republican ideology
that government spending must be reduced so that the wealthy can have tax
cuts. Even what may have been a well-meaning attempt to reform health care
was botched by his attempt to appease insurance companies, of all things.
When his or other Democrats' policies favor big business over the workers,
small businesses and family farmers, we will call them on it.
As the Democratic Party has strayed from its populist roots, it seems to
us that progressive populists have two options: organize a third party or
take back the Democratic Party. The two courses are not necessarily exclusive.
We believe progressives should support initiatives to open ballots to alternative
parties, both on the left and the right. We believe in proportional representation,
which would do away with winner-take-all elections, as well as the need
to gerrymander election districts, and would give minority political movements
a voice in local, state and national government. And we believe in public
funding of campaigns to eliminate the need for candidates to scrounge for
money from special interest groups.
In the meantime, progressives should take back the Democratic Party from
the monied interests. The corporations may spend their millions to control
the American political debate, and neither Congress nor the courts will
do anything to stop them, but we don't have to lie down. The corporations
may rent our legislators, but they can't buy our votes. They may shut us
out of TV, radio and the monopoly daily newspapers, but they can't stop
us from putting our newspaper on the street and on the Internet.
Cynicism and despair are poison to democracy, but that is what the corporations
pour into the American debate via the daily news and infotainment. Fifty-one
percent of the American electorate voted with their butts in 1996, in dissatisfaction
with the choices they were offered. If we can give them better choices we
can declare independence from corporatized plutocracy. It will take a guerilla
operation to mobilize them, but that's the way of all revolutions.
Nowadays, deregulation has allowed huge corporations to gobble up TV and
radio stations -- in some cases allowing one corporation to control every
major radio station in a metropolitan area -- and broadcasters have dropped
even the pretense of a public service responsibility. A few of the smaller
markets remain in the hands of independent operators and Jim Hightower can
be heard on more than 100 of them through the United Broadcasting Network.
If he isn't on in your area, but Rush Limbaugh and other right-wingers are,
demand that your local radio station give Hightower a try.
Also, you can give us a hand in getting out the word about the Progressive
Populist. We are about half-way to the break-even point and you can
get us there either by buying a friend (or your public library) a gift subscription
for $12 or sending us the addresses of five friends who might be interested
in our Journal from the Heartland. We'll send each of them a free sample.
Just call 1-800-205-7067 for details. Ultimately the success of the Progressive
Populist is up to you. We appreciate your support.
-- Jim Cullen
News | Current
Issue | Back Issues | Essays
About the Progressive Populist |
How to Subscribe | How
to Contact Us
Copyright © 1997 The Progressive Populist