Our long national distraction is over. We wish we could take pleasure at
the right-wingers flummoxed at President Clinton's acquittal by the Senate
on the charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Instead we fear that
the President, trying to beat Special Persecutor Kenneth Starr to the history
books, will be tempted once again to betray his progressive allies and cut
bad deals with the Republicans on Social Security, Medicare and Fast Track
for Free Trade.
We may yet wish the Senate had gone ahead with the full list of witnesses
Henry Hyde wanted to parade through the well of the Senate. There is little
reason to trust the administration, or hope that Congress will do any good
for Main Street over Wall Street.
Clinton bought into the Social Security scare tactics when he proclaimed
in the State of the Union address that we should save Social Security "first
and above all" for the 21st century. Sounds good, except the fears
of a Social Security shortfall have been ginned up by conservatives who
have been scheming to do away with the New Deal's signature program ever
since it was enacted in 1935.
Once again, the "reformers" are pouncing on a phony crisis: If
we see the low annual growth rate of 1.5% over the next 75 years, as the
pessimists forecast, Social Security would have to reduce benefits paid
after 2032. However, that projected growth rate is less than half the rate
of the past 75 years. A normal growth rate would leave the system flush
with cash. Also, if the growth rate does average only 1.5% over the
next 75 years, investments in the stock market would not show the 7% annual
return on equities which the privatizers assume in their proposals to replace
the Social Security system.
In addition, moving to a privatized Social Security system would require
a tax increase or a reduction in benefits for current retirees as revenues
are diverted into private accounts. The only ones who would see higher benefits
are Wall Street traders.
Also look out for the Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare's
report on how to reform the health insurance program to benefit the healthy
and wealthy at the expense of the poor and infirm. The proposal by Sen.
John Breaux, D-Louisiana, the commission's chair, would eliminate the entitlement
of health care for seniors and turn Medicare into a voucher program to pay
part of private insurance premiums. Breaux's proposal also would raise the
eligibility age from 65 to 67, which would throw several million retirees
into the ranks of the uninsured. The plan does not even address the main
problems facing Medicare, such as the failure to cover prescription drugs
and the failure to reduce out of pocket expenditures, nor does it address
the financial challenges facing Medicare. A complete waste of time.
The administration is particularly untrustworthy on trade issues, where
it has slavishly followed Wall Street's line. In 1997 only a popular uprising
prevented the Republican congressional leadership from winning approval
of Fast Track, which allows the rubber-stamping of trade pacts by Congress
with a minimum of public and congressional scrutiny. While the Fast Track
debate was going on, but unknown to most members of Congress and unreported
in the mainstream press, U.S. officials were engaged in secret negotiations
in Paris to draft a Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI), which would
establish a "bill of rights" for multinational corporations that
would threaten domestic sovereignty. [See "The Next Battle: MAI,"
MAI finally was scuttled at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development last fall, due in large part to objections by citizens' groups
who mobilized on the Internet despite the news blackout. However, in January
the European Union and Japan announced that they will push for MAI-like
investment negotiations in the World Trade Organization (WTO). And multinational
corporations are working to remove public interest regulation in other venues,
including NAFTA expansion, the proposed African Trade and Development Act
(alias NAFTA for Africa, discussed below), the International Monetary Fund
(IMF), the TransAtlantic Economic Partnership (TEP), and the Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum. That makes it extremely important that
Congress--and the public--has the time to scrutinize every trade deal that
comes before it.
Still, the corporate lobby hopes Senate compromisers can jar Fast Track
loose. The United States will be hosting a meeting of the WTO later this
year to discuss global free trade. Clinton wants Fast Track by then.
There also will be pressure to expand NAFTA to include Chile, despite NAFTA's
dubious achievements during its first five years, as chronicled by Public
Citizen's Global Trade Watch and reported in this issue.
Coming up sooner is the NAFTA for Africa bill, sponsored by the unlikely
pair of Representatives, Philip Crane, R-Illinois, and Charles Rangel, D-New
York. A rerun of the African Growth and Opportunity Act that passed the
House in 1998 but stalled in the Senate, Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
noted in a recent column, "With friends like these, Africa certainly
doesn't need any enemies."
The Crane-Rangel bill is promoted by USAfrica, a coalition of U.S.-based
oil and other multinational corporations. In return for letting the multinationals
control the drilling, mining, harvesting and other resources within their
borders, the African countries would qualify for U.S. aid and gain more
access to the U.S. textile market. "The hitch is the whole quota system
ends in 2005, at which point no one but China will be in this sector,"
Global Trade Watch reports. "So, Africa gets led down a dead end and
mainly U.S. women and people of color in this sector lose their jobs now.
The other benefit given some countries is more access to the U.S. market
for steel, NO JOKE!"
Sponsor Crane showed his sensitivity to the welfare of Africa last year
when he told an International Fiscal Association gathering in Chicago, as
reported in Congress Daily: "Of those countries in sub-Saharan
Africa, to be sure, a lot of them are retards. I mean they've got a long
way to go."
Of course, you don't have to be against everything. This year, Rep. Jesse
Jackson Jr., who calls the Crane-Rangel bill the "African Recolonization
Act," has introduced the African HOPE (Human Rights, Opportunity, Partnership
and Empowerment) Act. Jackson's bill would focus on debt relief for African
nations, but also would protect American workers by requiring companies
doing business in Africa and planning to export to the United States to
adhere to environmental, worker safety and labor rights standards similar
to those required of companies operating in the United States. These companies
would also be required to pay a living wage to employees in Africa.
After the impeachment debacle, Republicans are desperate to show they can
accomplish something. Clinton should demand that "fair trade"
provisions be included in any global agreements. While he's at it, he could
make sure Congress increases the minimum wage, reforms campaign financing
and gives progressives a seat at the table when the budget is written.
In his two years remaining in office Clinton can stand up for progressive
Democratic principles that got him elected twice. Or Clinton can join in
a "bipartisan" deal with the GOP to scale back Social Security
benefits, privatize Medicare, make it easier for manufacturers to send jobs
further away from the United States and adopt limited health care reforms
to clarify the rights of insurance companies.
Neither route will redeem his tragically flawed administration, but standing
up for a progressive Democratic agenda in the next year at least might help
the Democrats capture a progressive majority in 2000 to enact that agenda.
Or he can finally merge the Democrats into the Republican Party and join
Vernon Jordan on the boards of the Fortune 500 in gratitude for his eight
years of service to Wall Street.
Contact the White House at 202-456-1414 or Congress at 202-224-3121. Write
your congressmember c/o U.S. House, Washington, DC 20515; U.S. Senate, Washington,
or the President, White House, Washington DC 20500.
-- Jim Cullen
News | Current Issue
| Back Issues | Essays
About the Progressive Populist | How
to Subscribe | How to Contact Us
Copyright © 1999 The Progressive Populist